Bombay High CourtWP/1001/2015dismissed

Sandhya Babanrao Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra

2016-02-18Hon'Ble Shri Justice M.T. Joshi2 pages

(1) 24-crwp1001-15.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1001 OF 2015 Sandhya Babanrao Patil ..Petitioner

Versus

State of Maharashtra ..Respondent -- Mr.Amol Sawant, advocate for petitioner Mr.R.B.Bagul, A.P.P. for respondent - State -- CORAM : M.T. JOSHI, J.

DATE : FEBRUARY 18, 2016 PER COURT :

Heard.

2] The record would show that on the basis of the material on record, the learned Special Judge has held that the present petitioner cannot be discharged.

3] The material on record would show that after marriage of the present petitioner with the

(2) 24-crwp1001-15.odt principal accused, the property came to be purchased. The explanation, if any, of the petitioner regarding the source of funds including certain oral transaction, is required to be examined on merit by the learned Special Judge. 4] In the circumstances, no case on merit is made out in the present petition. The Criminal Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed.

[M.T. JOSHI, J.] kbp