Sidekshana Sambhaji Boinwad v. Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee Through Its Member Secretary And Others
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.8008 OF 2016 Santosh s/o Hanmantrao Khanderay ...
PETITIONER
VERSUS
Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad and others ...
RESPONDENTS .....
Shri S.S. Phatale, Advocate for petitioner Shri V.M. Kagne, A.G.P. for State .....
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.8086 OF 2016 Mohini d/o Ramchandra Kamble ...
PETITIONER
VERSUS
Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad and others ...
RESPONDENTS .....
Shri S.S. Phatale, Advocate for petitioner Shri A.B. Girase, Government Pleader for State .....
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.8120 OF 2016 Kum. Sidekshana d/o Sambhaji Boinwad ...
PETITIONER
VERSUS
Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad and others ...
RESPONDENTS .....
Shri S.S. Phatale, Advocate for petitioner Shri S.S. Dande, A.G.P. for State .....
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.8122 OF 2016 Kum. Shilpa d/o Sambhaji Boinwad ...
PETITIONER
VERSUS
Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad and others ...
RESPONDENTS .....
Shri S.S. Phatale, Advocate for petitioner Shri A.B. Girase, Govt. Pleader, for State .....
CORAM:
R.M. BORDE AND A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ.
DATED:
29th July, 2016.
ORAL ORDER :
1.
Heard.
2.
Petitioners claim to be belonging to 'Koli Mahadev' Scheduled Tribe and are in receipt of tribe certificates issued by
the competent authority containing certification accordingly. Tribe certificates issued in favour of petitioners were referred to the Scrutiny Committee for verification, however, Scrutiny Committee turned down the proposals on the ground that description of caste in the tribe certificates is incorrectly recorded as 'Mahadev Koli' and not as 'Koli Mahadev' and, petitioners have been given liberty to secure proper certificates and submit the same for verification once again.
3.
The issue raised in the instant petitions is no more res-integra in view of decision rendered by this Court in Writ Petition No.4536/2014 and other companion petitions. In view of decision in aforesaid writ petitions, decision of the Scrutiny Committee is upheld. Petitioners undertake to co-operate the Scrutiny Committee in rendering decision within prescribed time frame. In the facts and circumstances, we proceed to pass following order :
a) Petitioners may approach the concerned Scrutiny Committee for issuance of photostat/ true copy of the tribe certificates produced by them for verification, within a period of two months from today. The Scrutiny Committee, on receipt of such applications, issue true copy/
certified copy of the tribe certificates produced by respective petitioners for verification to the Committee, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of such application.
b) On receipt of photostat / certified copy of the tribe certificate, petitioners shall approach the Sub-Divisional Officer/ Competent authority, with an application for issuance of tribe certificate within a period of six weeks, thereafter.
c) On receipt of tribe certificates, petitioners shall tender the certificates with the proposals in the prescribed proforma to the Scrutiny Committee within a period of eight weeks and, the Scrutiny committee shall proceed to determine the claim for verification of the tribe certificates in accordance with the provisions of law and render decision as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of eight months from the date of receipt of the proposals.
d) In the meanwhile, no adverse action shall be taken against petitioners merely on the ground of failure to submit validation certificates and, it would be open for the employers/ educational institute to take
appropriate steps in the event of failure of petitioners to substantiate their claim and to secure validation certificates.
4.
Writ petitions stand disposed of accordingly. ( A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.) (R.M. BORDE, J.) fmp/wp8008.16