← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/10023/2018disposed offdismissed for default

Sangita Sunil Pawar And ORS v. N.Kumarsamy Natraja And ANR

2019-06-14Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1061 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.845 OF 2019 IN FAST/252/2019 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD., THR ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, AURANGABAD

VERSUS

SANGITA SUNIL PAWAR AND OR ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Ambhore M. M.

Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. R. L. Kute. ...

WITH CA/10023/2018 IN FAST/22671/2018 ...

CORAM : SMT.VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.

DATE : 14-06-2019.

PER COURT :

1.

Both these applications have filed for getting the delay of 190 and 22 days respectively condoned for challenging the same award. 2.

Civil application No.845 of 2019 is filed by the insurance company whereas Civil application No.10023 of 2018 is filed by the original claimants.

3.

Heard both sides in both the applications.

4.

Taking into consideration the fact that, both the parties are challenging the same award and there is delay irrespective of the

CA 845-2019 number, the delay is condoned for the reasons stated therein. 5.

Both the applications stand allowed. Both the appeals be verified and numbered and they be placed for consideration on 0907-2019. (SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI) JUDGE vjg/-