The State Of Maharashtra And ORS v. Tukaram Honnu Rathod

(1) 918 CA-1268.2018.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 918 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1268 OF 2018 IN FAST/23615/2017 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1275 OF 2018 IN FAST/23615/2017 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1288 OF 2018 IN FAST/23695/2017 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1291 OF 2018 IN FAST/23695/2017 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1295 OF 2018 IN FAST/23698/2017 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1296 OF 2018 IN FAST/23698/2017 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1293 OF 2018 IN FAST/23701/2017 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1294 OF 2018 IN FAST/23701/2017 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

VERSUS

TUKARAM HONNU RATHOD --- Mr. D.J. Patil, A.G.P. for appellant State.

Mr. B.K. Pawar, Advocate for the respondents/claimants. --- CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED :

18 FEBRUARY 2025.

ORDER:-

(2) 918 CA-1268.2018.odt IN CIVIL APPLICATION NOS. 1268/2018, 1288/2018, 1295/2018, 1293/2018 :

1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The appellant - Acquiring Body in all these applications is seeking condonation of delay of 969 days, which appears to be caused due to obtaining sanctions at various stages. There is no strong objection from other side and therefore the delay of 969 days stands condoned.

3.

The appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

4.

Applications are accordingly disposed of.

IN CIVIL APPLICATION NOS. 1275/2018, 1291/2018, 1296/2018, 1294/2018 :

.

Since the appellant Acquiring Body has not deposited the amount as directed by this Court, the conditional order of stay has already been vacated. The respondents/claimants are at liberty to go for execution proceeding.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) VD_Dhirde