Amrapali Nagorao Waghmare v. Dr. Ganpat More

1 916 cp 698-24

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONT. PETITION NO. 698 OF 2024 IN WP/11133/2023 AMRAPALI NAGORAO WAGHMARE

VERSUS

DR. GANPAT MORE ...

Mr. Tukaram Maruti Venjane, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. S. J. Salgare, AGP for Respondent-State Mr. Jadhav Vinod B., Advocate for Respondent Nos.3 & 4 ....

CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, JJ.

DATED : 25/06/2025.

P. C. :

Learned advocate for the petitioner fairly submits that the order of this court is complied with. He, however, makes a grievance that benefit of leave encashment is denied by the Education Officer and he intends to challenge the same. Hence, the order is complied with, contempt petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) VS Maind/-