← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/10492/2022delay condonatedrejected

Exe. Engineer, Irri. Pro. Majbutikaran Div. Omerga, Now Osmanabad M. Pro. Div. Mkkvdc, Pune And Oth v. Gangadhar S/O Ram Jalkote And Others

2023-01-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More2 pages

(1) 930 CA-10492.2022.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 930 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10492 OF 2022 IN FAST/21669/2020 WITH CA/10496/2022 IN FAST/21673/2020 WITH CA/10500/2022 IN FAST/21680/2020 EX. ENGINEER, IRRI. PRO. MAJBUTIKARAN DIV. OMERGA UNDER M.K.K.V.D.C. PUNE AND OTHERS

VERSUS

GANGADHAR RAM JALKOTE AND OTHERS ...

Mr. Prashant Nangare, Advocate for applicant Acquiring Body. Mr. B.K. Pawar, Advocate holding for Mr. Ajeet Kale, Advocate for respondents.

...

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED :

3rd January 2023.

ORDER:- 1.

Heard rival submissions. The appellant - Acquiring Body is seeking condonation of delay periods as mentioned in all these applications. The delay appears to be caused due to obtaining approvals at various stages. The learned Counsel for the respondents claimants strongly opposed the applications on the ground that despite order of this Court, the Acquiring Body has not deposited any amount of compensation. However, the respondents - claimants are always at liberty to go for execution of the impugned awards if the Acquiring Body has not deposited such amounts of compensation. In view of the same and for the reasons stated in all these applications, the delay periods stand condoned.

(2) 930 CA-10492.2022.odt 2.

The appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

3.

The applications are accordingly disposed of. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) vd_dhirde