Anil Raju Mungase v. The State Of Maharashtra

1 910-ABA.1103-22.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 910 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1103 OF 2022 ANIL RAJU MUNGASE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Jayabhar Dattatraya R. APP for Respondent-State : Mr. V. M. Kagne.

...

CORAM : S. G. MEHARE, J.

DATE : 07.09.2022 PER COURT :- 1.

Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for the respondent-State.

2.

The facts of the case have been discussed in detail in the order dated 24.08.2022. The interim protection has been granted to the applicant since they have settled their dispute amicably. The parties to the litigation do not want to contest. The complainant himself is not interested to proceed with the matter.

3.

The learned APP has opposed the application contending that the injured has suffered the serious injuries and material investigation is to be made. The learned APP may be right, but

2 910-ABA.1103-22.odt the parties have right to resolve their problem at their own level, if possible.

4.

In view of the facts of the case, the application deserves to be allowed. Hence, the following order :

O R D E R

(i) The application is allowed.

(ii) The interim protection granted to the applicant by the order dated 24.08.2022 is confirmed on the same terms and conditions.

(S. G. MEHARE, J.) ...

vmk/-