Sudhir Madhuikar Galphade v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

wp8134.15 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8134 OF 2015 SUDHIR MADHUKAR GALPHADE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS .....

Advocate for petitioner : Mr. D. R. Irale Patil Additional G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 to 4 : Mr. K. G. Patil Advocate for respondent No. 5 : Mr. S. S. Tope .....

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND V. K. JADHAV, JJ.

DATED : 6th AUGUST, 2015 P.C. :- 1.

We have heard Mr. Irale Patil, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. K. G. Patil, the learned Additional Government Pleader for respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and Mr. Tope, the learned counsel for respondent No. 5.

2.

The limited grievance made in the petition is that the Divisional Commissioner has already forwarded the proposal with regard to the transfer in State sector, to the Director i.e. respondent No. 4, however, no decision is taken by respondent No. 4 in this regard for almost two years.

wp8134.15 -23.

Considering the above, we pass the following order :

O R D E R

I.

In case the said proposal dated 04.06.2013 (Exh. "G") submitted by the Commissioner to respondent No. 4Director, is pending with respondent No. 4, then respondent No. 4-Director shall take decision as per the existing policy in accordance with law, within a period of three (3) months from today, and thereafter, forward the same to respondent Nos. 2 and 3, who shall, in turn, take appropriate decision upon the same in accordance with law and existing policy, expeditiously and preferably within a period of four (4) months from the date of receipt of the said proposal by them.

II.

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. ( V. K. JADHAV, J.) ( S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ) rlj/