Kisan Bahenaji Pawar v. Hari Bahenaji Pawar

2573.2015CA.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2573 OF 2015 IN SECOND APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 22476 OF 2014 Kisan s/o Bahenaji Pawar ...Applicant

Versus

Hari s/o Bahenaji Pawar ...Respondent ...

Mr. Ganachari Shrinivas M., Advocate for applicant Mr. S. B. Tambe (Salunke) for R/sole ...

CORAM: SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.

Date: 6th January, 2017 PER COURT:

1.

Learned advocate for the applicant points out that delay is sought to be accounted for under the reasons as are appearing in civil application.

2.

Learned advocate for the respondent though purports to resist is not in a position to dispute veracity of the reasons. In the facts and circumstances, it would be expedient to condone the delay occurred in filling second appeal.

2573.2015CA.odt 3.

In view of aforesaid, civil application stands granted in terms of prayer clause (B) and is disposed of. (SUNIL P. DESHMUKH) JUDGE VDK