Subhash Raghunath Pawar (C- 192) v. The State Of Maharasthra

1 18-crwp969-16.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.969 OF 2016 Subhash Raghunath Pawar ..Petitioner Vs.

The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent -- Mr.U.M.Mhaske, Advocate for petitioner (appointed) Mr.M.M.Nerlikar, APP for respondents -- CORAM : S.S. SHINDE AND SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : SEPTEMBER 15, 2016 PER COURT :

Heard.

2.

The learned A.P.P. for the respondents informs the Court that the prayer of the petitioner for releasing him on Furlough has been favourably considered and to that effect, order is passed by the competent authority.

3.

In that view of the matter, nothing survives in the present Writ Petition. The Writ Petition stands disposed of.

2 18-crwp969-16.odt 4.

Since Mr.Mhaske, the learned Counsel is appointed as an amicus curiae to prosecute the cause of the petitioner, his fees be paid as per the schedule of fees maintained by the High Court Legal Services Sub-Committee, Aurangabad.

[SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.] [S.S. SHINDE, J.] kbp