Pramod Dadaji Jadhav v. The State Of Maharashtra An Others

1 974-wp-7880-2020.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7880 OF 2020 Pramod Dadaji Jadhav ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others ... Respondents ....

Mr. S. N. Gaikwad, Advocate for petitioner Mr. K. N. Lokhande, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 ....

CORAM :S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND R. G. AVACHAT, JJ.

DATED : 27th NOVEMBER, 2020 PER COURT :- .

The learned AGP accepts notice for respondent Nos.1 and 2.

2.

It is submitted that validation proceedings in respect of the tribe claim of the petitioner is pending with the scrutiny committee, the same is not decided.

3.

Without issuing notice to the petitioner the respondents have placed the petitioner on the supernumerary post.

2 974-wp-7880-2020.doc 4.

As the impugned order is without notice to the petitioner, we quash and set aside the impugned order. 5.

In case the respondents want to take action against the petitioner placing the petitioner on supernumerary post or otherwise, then notice shall be issued to the petitioner giving to show cause. In that event, the petitioner can file reply and bring all the relevant facts to the notice of the respondent-committee. 6.

The committee shall decide the validation proceedings expeditiously and preferably within a period of six (06) months. 7.

The petitioner shall appear before the committee on 29.12.2020, if the circumstances so permit.

8.

Writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

[ R. G. AVACHAT, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] SMS