← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/9350/2023admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Collector Beed And ORS v. Babasaheb Keshav Ghorpade

2024-07-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant3 pages

2024:BHC-AUG:16283

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 16 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9346 OF 2023 IN FAST/21553/2023 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS COLLECTOR BEED AND ORS

VERSUS

BABASAHEB ABASAHEB ABDAGIRE AND ANR ...

A.S.G. for Applicant (U.O.I.) : Mr. A. G. Talhar AGP for Applicants/State : Mrs. M.N. Ghanekar Advocate for Respondent No. 1 : Mr. Shirsat Suhas R. ...

AND 20 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9340 OF 2023 IN FAST/21581/2023 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR BEED AND ANR

VERSUS

VISHWANATH DEORAO SHINDET DIED THROUGH LRS ...

A.S.G. for Applicant (U.O.I.) : Mr. A. G. Talhar AGP for Applicants/State : Mrs. M.L. Sangit Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 6 : Mr. Shirsat Suhas R. ...

AND 22 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9325 OF 2023 IN FAST/21781/2023 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR BEED AND ANR

VERSUS

CHATRABHUJ SOPAN SOLANKE ...

A.S.G. for Applicant (U.O.I.) : Mr. A. G. Talhar AGP for Applicants/State : Mr. G.O. Wattamwar Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Shirsat Suhas R. ...

AND 24 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9338 OF 2023 IN FAST/21614/2023 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR BEED AND ANR

VERSUS

APPARAO SAKHARAM SHINDE ...

A.S.G. for Applicant (U.O.I.) : Mr. A. G. Talhar AGP for Applicants/State : Mr. D.B.Bhange Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Shirsat Suhas R. ...

AND 33 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9350 OF 2023 IN FAST/21785/2023 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR BEED AND ANR

VERSUS

BABASAHEB KESHAV GHORPADE ...

A.S.G. for Applicant (U.O.I.) : Mr. A. G. Talhar AGP for Applicants/State : Mr. A.M.Phule Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Shirsat Suhas R. ...

CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT, J.

DATE : 29th JULY, 2024.

PER COURT :

1.

These applications are for condonation of delay respectively caused in filing the appeal/s challenging the judgment and award passed by the learned reference Court. 2.

These applications are strongly opposed by the respondents.

3.

For the reasons stated in the applications, delay stands condoned respectively.

4.

The Civil Applications stands allowed and disposed off.

( KISHORE C. SANT ) JUDGE mahajansb/