← Library
Bombay High CourtCP/504/2021disposed off

Rashtra Jagruti Bahuddeshiya Vikas Sanstha Latur Through President Quadri Asir Khudratullah And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2021-12-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. G. Dige2 pages

504.21CP.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1042 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.504 OF 2021 IN WP/1554/2017 RASHTRA JAGRUTI BAHUDDESHIA VIKAS SANSTHA & OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS ...

Mr.Kishor J. Ghute Patil, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. S.K. Tambe, AGP for the respondent/State. ...

CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND S.G. DIGE, JJ.

DATE : 14th DECEMBER, 2021 PER COURT :- .

We have heard Mr.Ghute Patil, learned advocate for the petitioner. The learned advocate submits that the respondents have deliberately and willfully disobeyed the order dated 26.02.2020 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.1554/2017.

2.

The learned A.G.P. submits that the decision has been taken on the proposal on 8th December, 2021. Post of Supervisor has been rejected but the request of the petitioner for additional teacher is recommended to the Government by the Director of Education as the powers are with the Government.

504.21CP.odt 3.

There is inordinate delay in deciding the proposal. The reason given by the learned A.G.P. is that because of Covid-19 pandemic, the decision could not be taken.

4.

The reason does not appear to be convincing as the other activities were in progress. The Director of Education ought to be diligent in complying with the orders of the Courts. We do not approve such lethargy on the part of the Director of Education in delaying the decision. The decision is taken belatedly and probably the same appears to have been served upon the petitioner.

5.

Considering the fact that the decision is now taken though belatedly, the contempt petition is disposed of. The petitioner certainly can assail the orders adverse to his interest. No costs.

(S.G.DIGE, J.) (S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.) SGA