Bombay High CourtWP/9697/2018rejected at admission stage
Koushalya Dnyaneshwar Khandekar v. The Union Of India And Others
2018-08-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil1 pages
{1} wp9697.18.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 9697 OF 2018 Koushalya w/o Dnyaneshwar Khandekar Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & others Respondents Mr. D.K. Dagadkhair, advocate for petitioner. Mr. S.G. Karlekar, AGP for respondent no. 2.
Mr. S.S. Deve, advocate for respondent no. 1. CORAM : R.M.BORDE AND MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : 21st August, 2018.
P.C. :
Petitioner does not have a legal right to claim disbursement of amount from the bank. As such, petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, need not be agitated. Petition as such, stands rejected.
MANGESH S. PATIL R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE dyb