← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/9697/2018rejected at admission stage

Koushalya Dnyaneshwar Khandekar v. The Union Of India And Others

2018-08-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil1 pages

{1} wp9697.18.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 9697 OF 2018 Koushalya w/o Dnyaneshwar Khandekar Petitioner

Versus

Union of India & others Respondents Mr. D.K. Dagadkhair, advocate for petitioner. Mr. S.G. Karlekar, AGP for respondent no. 2.

Mr. S.S. Deve, advocate for respondent no. 1. CORAM : R.M.BORDE AND MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : 21st August, 2018.

P.C. :

Petitioner does not have a legal right to claim disbursement of amount from the bank. As such, petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, need not be agitated. Petition as such, stands rejected.

MANGESH S. PATIL R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE dyb