← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/10268/2017disposed offdismissed for default

Harshada Balu Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2017-08-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shantanu S. Kemkar,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre2 pages

wp10268.17 (1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.10268 OF 2017 Smt. Harshada Balu Patil, Age: 30 years, Occu: Service i.e. Asst. Teacher, Sau. Savitribai Shivajirao Deore Kanya Vidyalaya, Boris, Tq. & Dist. Dhule, R/o. C/o Sau. Savitribai Shivajirao Deore Kanya Vidyalaya, Boris, Tq. & Dist. Dhule ..PETITIONER

VERSUS

1.

The State of Maharashtra, Through Director of Education, Pune 2.

Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Dhule 3.

Shri Satidevi Trust, Boris, Tq. & Dist. Dhule, Through its President 4.

Headmistress, Sau. Savitribai Shivajirao Deore Kanya Vidyalaya, Boris, Tq. & Dist. Dhule ..RESPONDENTS Mr M. S. Shaikh, Advocate holding for Mr Sachin S. Deshmukh, Advocate for petitioner;

Mr S. B. Yawalkar, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 & 2 CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE : 21st August, 2017 ORAL ORDER Feeling aggrieved by the inaction on the part of respondent no.2 - Education Officer, in regard to grant of approval to the petitioner's

wp10268.17 (2) appointment on the post of Assistant Teacher, in spite of there being a proposal to that effect sent by the management on 29th April, 2017 (Exh. "C"), the petitioner has filed this petition. 2.

Though the said proposal is not happily worded, but it seems that the said proposal is for grant of approval to the petitioner's appointment as Assistant Teacher.

3.

In the circumstances, we dispose of this petition by directing the Education Officer to consider and take appropriate decision on the said proposal.

4.

The petitioner may also approach the management for giving a specific proposal for her appointment as Assistant Teacher, to be submitted before the Education Officer. The management shall immediately issue such proposal, in case there is no legal impediment. 5.

The Education Officer within one month from today shall consider the said proposal as also the proposal dated 29th April, 2017 (Exh."C") in its correct perspective and take appropriate decision on the same within three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 6.

With the aforesaid directions, petition is disposed of. (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.) amj