Snehal W/O Nitin Vetal v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

criapln4177-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4177 OF 2015 (Snehal w/o Nitin Vetal Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others) ---- Mr. Bipinchandra K. Patil, Advocate holding for and with Mr. K.H. Dongre, Advocate for the applicant Mr. M.B. Bharaswadkar, A.P.P. for the respondent-State None for respondents No. 2 and 3 ---- CORAM : M.T. JOSHI, J.

DATE : 10/03/2016 ORAL ORDER :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.P.P. The respondents No. 2 and 3 are absent despite due service of notice on them.

2.

Perused the order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge. The learned Additional Sessions Judge has taken into consideration the absence of the serious allegations of commission of rape in the first complaint filed by the present applicant. In that view of the matter, the order of granting anticipatory bail cannot be called as perverse one. The present application is, therefore, dismissed.

[M.T. JOSHI] JUDGE npj/criapln4177-2015