Manisha Tapiram Patil And ORS v. Devidas Sitaram Koli And ANR

(1) 965 CA-12487.2022.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 965 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12487 OF 2022 IN FAST/21652/2022 MANISHA TAPIRAM PATIL AND OTHERS

VERSUS

DEVIDAS SITARAM KOLI AND ANOTHER ...

Mr. Jitendra Patil, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. Manoj Shinde, Advocate for respondent No.2. ...

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED :

20.12.2022.

ORDER:- 1.

Heard rival submissions. The applicants are seeking condonation of delay of 74 days in filing the appeal. The delay appears to be caused due to their financial crisis. The learned Counsel for the Insurance Company strongly opposed the application on the ground that the delay is not properly explained. However, considering the statutory right of the applicants, the delay of 74 days stands condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid delay period.

2.

The appeal be placed for admission after removal of office objections.

3.

The Civil Application is disposed of accordingly. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) vd_dhirde