Sadananad Tanaji Patil v. Pralhad Chitambar Patil

ca12552-16 drp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12552 OF 2016 IN SECOND APPEAL STAMP NO.23256 OF 2016 Sadanand Tanaji Patil APPLICANT

VERSUS

Pralhad Chitambar Patil RESPONDENT .......

Mr. A. B. Kale, Advocate for the applicant Mr. S. A. Wakure, Advocate for the respondent .......

[CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.] DATE : 25 th NOVEMBER, 2016 ORDER :

1.

Learned advocate for the applicants points out that delay is sought to be accounted for under the reasons as are appearing in civil application.

2.

Learned advocate for the respondent is not in a position to dispute veracity of the reasons. In the facts and circumstances, it would be expedient to condone the delay occurred in filing second appeal.

3.

In view of aforesaid, civil application stands granted in terms of prayer clause "B" and is disposed of. Interim relief to continue.

[SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.] drp/ca12552-16