← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/9131/2019disposed offdismissed for default

Marathwada Sarva Shramik Sanghtana Through Its Joint Secretary v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2019-08-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 59 WRIT PETITION NO.9131 OF 2019 MARATHWADA SARVA SHRAMIK SANGHTANA THROUGH ITS JOINT SECRETARY

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

60 WRIT PETITION NO.9140 OF 2019 MARATHWADA SARVA SHRAMIK SANGHTANA THROUGH ITS JOINT SECRETARY

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

61 WRIT PETITION NO.9141 OF 2019 MARATHWADA SARVA SHRAMIK SANGHTANA THROUGH ITS JOINT SECRETARY

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

62 WRIT PETITION NO.9142 OF 2019 MARATHWADA SARVA SHRAMIK SANGHTANA THROUGH ITS JOINT SECRETARY

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

63 WRIT PETITION NO.9153 OF 2019 MARATHWADA SARVA SHRAMIK SANGHTANA THROUGH ITS JOINT SECRETARY

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

64 WRIT PETITION NO.9159 OF 2019 MARATHWADA SARVA SHRAMIK SANGHTANA THROUGH ITS JOINT SECRETARY

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

66 WRIT PETITION NO.9206 OF 2019 MARATHWADA SARVA SHRAMIK SANGHTANA THROUGH ITS JOINT SECRETARY

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

67 WRIT PETITION NO.9207 OF 2019 MARATHWADA SARVA SHRAMIK SANGHTANA THROUGH ITS JOINT SECRETARY

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Barde Parag Vijay AGP for Respondents: S.B.Yawalkar ----- CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA & MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : 08/08/2019 PER COURT :

The petitioners submit that revenue recovery certificate has been issued in favour of the petitioners on 15.10.2018. The revenue authorities are not taking any steps to execute the revenue recovery certificate.

2] Mr. S.B. Yawalkar, the learned A.G.P. submits that in fact the proposal was moved by respondent Nos. 5 to 7 to respondent No.4 for

getting the amount payable to the petitioners and respondent No. 4 has forwarded it to respondent No.3. The respondent No.3 would take decision upon it. Respondent No.3 may take decision on the said proposal as is forwarded to him preferably within two months. If the proposal as forwarded by the respondent Nos. 5 to 7 to respondent No.4 and respondent No.4 in turn to respondent No.3 is not fructified within a period of three months, then the concerned authority shall execute the revenue recovery certificate in favour of petitioners. Ofcourse the petitioners shall cooperate by showing the properties of the persons against whom the said revenue recovery certificates are to be executed.

3] As observed above, if within three months, the said proposal as contended by the learned A.G.P. is not fructified, then steps shall be initiated expeditiously and the said proceeding shall be taken to its logical end by taking all steps required under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code to execute the revenue recovery certificate expeditiously, if possible within six months. 4] Writ Petitions are accordingly disposed of. No costs. (MANGESH S. PATIL,J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) umg/