Mangala Trimbak Joshi v. Kishanchand Jeomal Kamnani And ORS

25 wp.997.09.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 997 OF 2009 MANGALA TRIMBAK JOSHI

VERSUS

KISHANCHAND JEOMAL KAMNANI AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner: Mr. Govind Kulkarni, h/f Mr. Rajendra S. Deshmukh. Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 & 2 : Mr. K. H. Surve, h/f Mr. Hemant Surve. APP for Respondent No.3 : Mr. S. W. Munde.

...

CORAM :

V. K. JADHAV, J.

DATE :

05th December, 2016.

P.C.:

.

The learned counsel for Petitioner / original Complainant submits that due to the subsequent events and passage of time, the cause for filing the criminal writ petition has been rendered infructuous. In view of this, the criminal writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. Rule is discharged.

[ V. K. JADHAV, J. ] ndm