Santosh Shankarrao More v. The Chairman Maharashtra State Electricity Board Staff Co Op Credit Society Ltdand Another
2024:BHC-AUG:7005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 948 WRIT PETITION NO.8472/2023 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 8585 OF 2023 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 8637 OF 2023 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.8586 OF 2023 GUNWANT SAHEBRAO SHERKAR
VERSUS
THE CHAIRMAN MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD STAFF COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD OSMANABAD Advocate for Respondent no.1 : Adv.V.S. Undre & 949 WRIT PETITION NO.8601 OF 2023 GAUTAM RAOSAHEB INGLE
VERSUS
THE CHAIRMAN MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD STAFF COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD OSMANABAD 950 WRIT PETITION NO.8548 OF 2023 AYUB BABUKHAN PATHAN
VERSUS
THE CHAIRMAN MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD STAFF COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD OSMANABAD
951 WRIT PETITION NO.8638 OF 2023 SANTOSH SHANKARRAO MORE
VERSUS
THE CHAIRMAN MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD STAFF COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD OSMANABAD WRIT PETITION NO.8469 OF 2023 PANDIT BABURAO GUNDRE
VERSUS
THE CHAIRMAN MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD STAFF COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD OSMANABAD & ANOTHER WRIT PETITION NO.8550 OF 2023 RAM DASHRATH KADAM
VERSUS
THE CHAIRMAN MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD STAFF COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD OSMANABAD
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.
DATE : 21.03.2024 P.C. :
1] Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2] From perusal of the judgment and order dated 16.11.2022 passed by the Industrial Court, Latur in Complaint [ULP] No.105/2016, it appears that, clause 25 of the Service Rules of the respondent - society is applicable to the employees of the respondent society. Clause 25 of the Maharashtra State Electricity Board Staff Co-operative Credit Society Ltd., Osmanabad is as under :
25.
सेवा्ቚवेशनियम- कम चा- यांचेखालील्ቚमाणे वगौकरण्ቦेणीराहतील.
1.
मैेजर/ व्यवस्थापक 2.
वरी्लिलपीक 3.
कनि्ቖलिलपीक पैकीमराठीइं्ቇजीटायपीस्टदो
4. शिशपाई/ डि,लेवारीबॉय 5.
वाह चालक
असाएकुणसोळाजागाराहतील, ज्यावेळीसंस्थेचे व्यवहार वाढतील त्यावेळी व काय कारी मं,ळाला आवश्यकता वाटल्यास जागा वाढवू िሗकवा रिरकाम्या होणा- या जागेवर ेमणुका केल्या जातील अशा जागा भरण्याचापूण अडि?कारीसंस्थेच्याचेअरमलाराहीलव त्यासजिजल्हाउपनिबं?काचीपूव परवागीआवश्यकआहे वमहारा्ቖ्रशासाच्याकम चान्या्ቚमाणेखालीलवेत्ቦेणी राहील.
1.
मैेजर1400-40-1600-50-2300ईबी-60-2600 2.
वरी्लिलपीक1200-30-1560ईबी-40-2040 3.
कनि्लिलपीक950-20-1150ईबी-25-1500 4.
सेवक750-12-870-इ-बी-14-940 5.
वाह चालक950-20-1150-इ-बी- 25-1500 • कैशहँ,ल(हाताळणी) करणाऱ्याकम चाऱ्यासअलाउन्स दरमहारु.50/- जादादेण्यातयेईल.
From the perusal of the impugned order, it is apparent that there is no consideration of clause 25 of the Service Rules in the order of the Tribunal. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that clause 25 grants them benefit of the pay scale equivalent to that of the State Government employees and they would be entitled for the revised pay scales.
3] The learned counsel for the respondents submits that clause 25 of the Service Rules would not be applicable to the employees as contended by the petitioners
and that they would not be entitled for the revised pay scale.
4] On perusal of the Service Rules, it is apparent that clause 25 is not considered by the Tribunal at all. In view of the same, the impugned judgments and orders passed by the Industrial Court, Latur are quashed and set aside. The matters are remanded back to the Industrial Court at Latur for consideration of the benefit as available under clause 25 of the Service Rules. The Industrial Court to decide the matters as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of the order of this Court. I have not expressed any view on merits of the contention raised and the tribunal will decide the remand matter on its own merits.
5] In view of the above, all Writ Petitions are disposed of.
6] In view of disposal of main writ petitions, all pending Civil Applications are also disposed of. [ARUN R. PEDNEKER] JUDGE DDC