Vasantrao Balkrushna Nangurde v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

(1) 20 CA-17144.2022 + 1.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 20 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.17144 OF 2022 IN FAST/6817/2021 SHESHRAO KISAN BHOSALE AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER AND 21 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.17147 OF 2022 IN FAST/23354/2021 VASANTRAO BALKRUSHNA NANGURDE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Mrs. Sangita Pahune Patil , Advocate for the applicants. Mr. S.P. Tiwari and Mr. B.V. Virdhe, AGPs in respective applications for respondent No.1.

...

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED :

10th July 2023.

ORDER:- 1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The respective applicants are seeking condonation of delay periods mentioned in these applications, which appears to be caused due to their poor financial condition. 3.

The learned A.G.P. strongly opposed the applications on the ground that no reasonable cause is mentioned for condoning the delay periods. The respondent No.2 Acquiring Body, though served, but remained absent.

(2) 20 CA-17144.2022 + 1.odt 4.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicants and for the reasons stated in the applications, the applications are allowed and the delay periods mentioned in these applications stand condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the periods of aforesaid delay.

5.

The appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

6.

The applications are accordingly disposed of. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) vd_dhirde