Bombay High CourtWP/10238/2015disposed offdismissed for default

Pallavi Sachin Bhosale v. Sachin Sopan Bhosale

2016-04-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde1 pages

{1} wp 10238.15.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.10238 OF 2015 Sau Pallavi w/o Sachin Bhosale Petitioner

Versus

Sachin s/o Sopan Bhosale Respondent Mr.R.A. Kasar advocate for the petitioner Mr.N.B. Narwade for Respondent _______________ CORAM : R.M. BORDE, J (Date : 25th APRIL, 2016.) PER COURT :- The parties agree that the Application, seeking restitution of conjugal rights, presented to the Trial Court is prescribed for arguments. After the arguments are heard, the learned Judge would be rendering decision in the matter.

In view of these peculiar facts & circumstances, without going into merits of the contentions raised by the parties, writ petition stands disposed of.

The Trial Court is directed to decide the pending Application, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of two months from today.

(R.M.BORDE, J) vbd