Prashant Bhaskar Chaudhari v. Gajanan Trading Company Through Its Proprietor Deepak Ghanshyam Chaudhari

( 1 ) cria2738.22

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 924 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2738 OF 2022 IN ALPST/7544/2022 PRASHANT BHASKAR CHAUDHARI

VERSUS

GAJANAN TRADING COMPANY THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR DEEPAKGHANSHYAM CHAUDHARI Mr.Shubham S. Pawar h/f. Mr.R.R. Karpe,Advocate for the applicant. Mr.S.R. Zambre, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr.P.M. Kulkarni, APP for the respondent/State.

CORAM

:

KISHORE C. SANT, J.

DATED :

27.01.2023 PC :- 01.

This application is filed seeking condonation of delay caused in filing application seeking leave to file appeal against acquittal. 02.

Learned Advocate for the applicant submits that the delay is not intentional and deliberate but is for bona fide reason. He has good case on merit as he is seeking leave to file appeal against acquittal in the proceeding under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. 03.

Learned Advocate for the respondent vehemently opposed the application saying that no sufficient reason is shown to condone the delay and prays for rejection of the application.

( 2 ) cria2738.22 04.

After hearing the parties, this Court finds that sufficient reason is mentioned in the application and in view of the same delay is condoned. The application for condonation of delay is allowed and disposed off. The Registry to register the application for leave to appeal. [KISHORE C. SANT, J.] snk/2023/JAN23/cria2738.22