The State Of Maharashtra And ANR v. Sunita Phulchand Tidke

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW APPLICATION (CIVIL) NO. 295 OF 2012 IN WP/7626/2011 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

VERSUS

SUNITA PHULCHAND TIDKE ---- Mr.S.K.Tambe, A.G.P. for applicants Mr.V.C.Patil, Advocate h/f. Mr.U.B.Bondar, Advocate for respondent ---- CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH AND SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE :

OCTOBER 31, 2017 PER COURT It appears that with the passage of time, the purpose underlying Review Application is worked out since it has been given to understand that original petitioner is now over 45 years of age and further that she has not been appointed on compassionate ground.

2.

In view of the same, nothing survives in the Review Application and the same stands disposed of.

[SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.] [SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.] kbp