State Of Mah v. Arvind Baliram Kale
( 1 )
IN THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT
PRESIDED OVER BY HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, HELD ON 12th DECEMBER, 2020 AT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES SUB-COMMITTEE, AT AURANGABAD 213 FIRST APPEAL NO.1262 OF 2008 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...Appellant V E R S U S ANANT RANGRAO KULKARNI
...Respondent
WITH FIRST APPEAL NO.1267 OF 2008 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...Appellant V E R S U S SHANTABAI RAM MULJE
...Respondent
WITH FIRST APPEAL NO.1268 OF 2008 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...Appellant V E R S U S RAM MALIKARJUN MULJE
...Respondent
WITH FIRST APPEAL NO.1269 OF 2008 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...Appellant V E R S U S ARVIND BALRAM KALE
...Respondent
WITH FIRST APPEAL NO.1272 OF 2008 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...Appellant V E R S U S DIGAMBAR DNYANOB NAGHE
...Respondent
WITH FIRST APPEAL NO.1270 OF 2008 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...Appellant V E R S U S RAMESH RANGNATH KULKARNI
...Respondent
WITH FIRST APPEAL NO.1265 OF 2008 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...Appellant V E R S U S VINAYAK SHIVAPPA BIRAJDAR
...Respondent
WITH FIRST APPEAL NO.1266 OF 2008 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...Appellant V E R S U S UTTAM RAMRAO KULKARNI
...Respondent
WITH 1/4
( 2 ) FIRST APPEAL NO.1274 OF 2008 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...Appellant V E R S U S MALIKARJUN SANGAPPA KITHAKARI
...Respondent
WITH FIRST APPEAL NO.1264 OF 2008 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...Appellant V E R S U S GULAB PANDU PUJARI
...Respondent
WITH FIRST APPEAL NO.1271 OF 2008 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...Appellant V E R S U S AMAN RAMRAO KULKARNI
...Respondent
WITH FIRST APPEAL NO.1273 OF 2008 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...Appellant V E R S U S RAM KERBA WAGHE
...Respondent
WITH FIRST APPEAL NO.1263 OF 2008 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...Appellant V E R S U S HANMANT LIMBA CHAYLE
...Respondent
...
Mr. A.M.Phule, learned A.G.P. for the appellant/State Mr. M.S.Patil, learned Advocate for the respondent/s ...
O R D E R
1.
The appeals proceedings are placed before us in today's National Lok Adalat.
2.
Mr.Phule, learned AGP for the appellant/State submits that the amount of compensation awarded by the SLAO is within the range of four times in view of the Government Resolution dated 03/11/2016 and subsequent Corrigendum dated 23/02/2017 and 13/08/2018. He further 2/4
( 3 ) submits that the appellant/State intends to withdraw the Appeals.
3.
Mr.Patil (Almalekar), learned Advocate for the respondent/s/original claimant/s submits that he has no objection to withdraw the appeals and filed undertakings to that effect.
4.
In these matters notification under Section 4 of the L.A. Act, 1894 under the old Act came to be published on 4th February, 1986 and award was passed by the SLAO on 31st March, 1989. The SLAO has deposited the amount of compensation in the reference Court in the year 1996 itself.
5.
Having regard to the above submissions and in view of the undertakings furnished by the learned advocate for the original claimant/s/respondent/s, the appeals stand disposed of as withdrawn.
7.
The amount of compensation deposited in the reference Court by the State, if any, lying there, the reference Court shall make disbursement of the same to the original claimant/s, if the compensation is not withdrawn earlier.
6.
The court fee refund certificate be issued to the 3/4
( 4 ) appellant/State as per the rules.
7.
Pending the civil application/s, if any, is/are disposed of.
8.
Parties to bear their own costs.
(S.P. BRAMHE) (S.G. SHETE) (SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI) ADVOCATE DIST.JUDGE(Retd.) JUDGE Member Member HEAD OF THE PANEL Date : 12th December, 2020 Place: Aurangabad sarowar 4/4