Rahul Kailash Shinde v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

1 928-CP-564-2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONT. PETITION NO.564 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3036 OF 2019 RAHUL KAILASH SHINDE ...PETITIONER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...RESPONDENTS Mr A.J. Patil, Advocate for Petitioner Mr K.N. Lokhande, AGP for Respondent-State CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.

DATE : 14th NOVEMBER, 2019 PER COURT :

1.

The admitted position by the party is, in view of the order of this Court, the proposal of the petitioner is rejected. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may take appropriate steps to challenge the decision by availing the remedy available under law.

2.

In view of these facts, nothing survives in the contempt petition. The contempt petition is disposed of. [ ANIL S. KILOR ] [ PRASANNA B. VARALE ] JUDGE JUDGE mta