Pralhad Vitthal Rithad v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

WP.9966-17.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 937 WRIT PETITION NO. 9966 OF 2017 PRALHAD VITTHAL RITHAD

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS WITH WRIT PETITION NO.9859 OF ABHIJEET RAMCHANDRA KUNDIKAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Mr. M.K.Deshnpande, Advocate for Petitioners Mrs. G.L.Deshpande, AGP for Respondents­State Mr. S.S.Naik, Advocate for Respondent Nos.6 & 7 ...

CORAM :

PRASANNA B. VARALE AND MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE :

21.11.2018 PER COURT :­ 1.

The petitioners in these two petitions, raised grievance and challenged to the order passed by the Education Officer (Secondary) Zilla Parishad, Parbhani dated 04.07.2017 thereby proposal for grant of approval to this petitioners was rejected. It was submitted in the Writ Petition that as the appointment of the petitioners was by following due procedure the rejection order is unsustainable.

WP.9966-17.odt 2.

The learned counsel appearing for the respective parties admit that during the pendency of the petition the petitioners have preferred an appeal before the Director of Education, Maharashtra State, Pune. The Director of Education undertook the exercise of hearing of the parties in the appeal. The learned AGP, Mrs. Deshpande today placed on record the orders passed by the Director of Education in the appeal. These copies are taken on record and marked 'X' collectively for identification. The perusal of the orders show that the Director of Education referred to the factual aspects and the submissions as well the record submitted by the Head Master. On consideration of this material, the Director of Education found that the appointment of these petitioners was by following due procedure and the appeal was allowed by grant of approval to these petitioners.

3.

In view of this fact, the grievance of the petitioners is redressed. Accordingly the petitions are disposed of. (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.) ...

vmk/­