Babasaheb Laxman Sarate (Died) Thr Lrs Santosh And ANR v. The Ex. Engineer, Minor Irrigation Div. Jalna And ORS

(1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 13 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12630 OF 2021 IN FAST/23476/2021 BABASAHEB LAXMAN SARATE (DIED) THR LRS SANTOSH AND ANR

VERSUS

THE EX. ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIV. JALNA AND ORS AND 14 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12631 OF 2021 IN FAST/11600/2021 SUBHASH BAJIRAO MADAN

VERSUS

THE EX. ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIV. JALNA AND ORS AND 15 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12632 OF 2021 IN FAST/23480/2021 VINAYAK SAHEBRAO KENDALE

VERSUS

THE EX. ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIV. JALNA AND ORS AND 16 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12633 OF 2021 IN FAST/23478/2021 GOVIND ARJUN SARATE AND ANR

VERSUS

THE EX. ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIV. JALNA AND

(2) ORS AND 17 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12673 OF 2021 IN FAST/11607/2021 DNYANESHWAR GOPINATH MADAN

VERSUS

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIV. JALNA AND OTHERS AND 18 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12674 OF 2021 IN FAST/23484/2021 THAKAJI KASHINATH MADAN

VERSUS

THE EX. ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIV. JALNA AND ORS AND 19 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12693 OF 2021 IN FAST/25395/2021 WITH CA/12697/2021 IN FAST/25456/2021 WITH CA/12696/2021 IN FAST/25442/2021 WITH CA/12698/2021 IN FAST/25446/2021 WITH CA/12694/2021 IN FAST/25437/2021 WITH CA/12695/2021 IN FAST/25452/2021 DHANRAJ NAMDEV CHAVAN

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR COLLECTOR, LATUR AND ORS Mr. Vilas m. Humbe, Advocate and Mr. Shashikiran N. Patil, Advocate for the applicant in respective matters

(3) Mr. P. N. Kutti, AGP, Mr. S. N. Morampalle, AGP, Mr. S. N. Kendre, AGP for the respondents/State in respective matters.

CORAM:VINAY JOSHI, J.

DATE:08-02-2022 P. C.

.

Heard.

2.

These are applications seeking condonation of delay caused in filing the first appeals against the judgments and awards.

3.

The learned AGP has objected for condonation of delay.

4.

Perused the application and particularly grounds set out in para Nos. 1 to 3 of the applications. It is submitted that due to illiteracy and poverty the applicants were not in a position to take immediate steps.

5.

Having regard to the nature of the litigation and cause canvassed for delay, it stands condoned on condition that the applicants are not entitled for interest or any other statutory

(4) benefits for delayed period.

6.

The applications stand disposed of.

[ VINAY JOSHI, J. ] VishalK/ca12630.21