← Library
Bombay High CourtCRA/56/2020dismissed

Gulam Kadir Khan Gulam Rasool Khan v. Raunak Ara Irfan Ali And Another

2023-11-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. G. Mehare2 pages

17-CRA-56-20.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.56 OF 2020 Gulam Kadir Khan Gulam Rasool Khan, Age 54 years, Occu. Police Constable, R/o. Block No. F-50/4, N-12, Chatrapati Nagar, Aurangabad ..

Applicant (Original Defendant)

Versus

1.

Raunak Ara Irfan Ali, Age 47 years, Occu. Service, 2.

Irfan Ali Raheman Ali, Age 57 years, Occu. Service, Both R/o. House No.17, Silk Milk Colony, Railway Station, Aurangabad ..

Respondents (Original Plaintiffs) Mr. P. F. Patni, Advocate for Applicant;

Mr. Punit S. Mehta, Advocate for Respondents CORAM :

S. G. MEHARE, J.

DATE :

07-11-2023 PER COURT :- 1.

Heard finally by the consent of the learned counsel for the respective parties.

2.

The tenant filed the present revision against the orders of eviction decree.

3.

After hearing the learned counsels, the Court was not convinced that there are grounds to be considered on merit. 4.

The Executing Court has issued the possession warrant. 5.

Learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicant's

17-CRA-56-20.odt daughter is going to marry in the month of February-2024. Hence, eight months time may be granted to vacate the premises. 6.

Learned counsel for the respondents submits that it would be a longer time for the reason that the landlord is running after the tenant since 2008.

7.

The landlord may be correct, but the situation to support the tenant is that his daughter is going to marry in the month of February-2024. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, six months time granted to the applicant to vacate the suit premises.

8.

The learned counsel for the respondents submits that he would not press for possession warrant for six months from today. 9.

The learned counsel for the parties submit that the Court came to conclusion that there is nothing to interfere with the impugned judgments, the revision application be disposed of finally. Hence, the order:-

ORDER

i) Civil Revision Application stands dismissed.

ii) The applicant/tenant shall vacate the premises within six months from today.

iii) The respondents/landlord will not press for the possession warrant for six months from today.

( S. G. MEHARE ) JUDGE rrd