Jyoti Ganpat Karale v. State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others

.. 1 ..

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1010 Writ Petition No.10051 Of 2021 Jyoti Ganpat Karale .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary and Others .. Respondents ...

Mr Arvind G Ambetkar, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr S.G. Karlekar, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3 Mr A.D. Aghav, Advocate for Respondent Nos.4 & 5 ...

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND R.N. LADDHA, JJ.

DATE : 09-09-2021 PER COURT : - 1.

The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has made an application for transfer at the nearer place to his residence. The same is not decided.

2.

The learned AGP accepts notice for Respondent Nos.1 to 3 and Mr Aghav, learned Counsel appears for Respondent Nos.4 and 5. 3.

Mr Aghav, learned Counsel submits that Respondent No.4 would decide the representation of the petitioner (page-77) on its Gajanan

.. 2 ..

own merits, expeditiously and preferably within a period of eight weeks.

4.

In view of the said statement, writ petition is disposed of. [ R.N. LADDHA ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA ] JUDGE JUDGE ...

Gajanan