Ashok Tukaram More v. Secretary Pandit Din Dayal Shiksan Sanstha And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12472 OF 2016 AND WRIT PETITION NO. 6293 OF 2016 ASHOK TUKARAM MORE

VERSUS

SECRETARY, PANDIT DIN DAYAL SHIKSAN SANSTHA AND ORS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Shri Kolhare S.R.

Advocate for Respondent 1 : Shri Kakade Y.V.

Advocate for Respondent 2 : Shri Chaudhari Y.S. AGP for Respondent - State : Shri Kutti P.N.

...

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.

Dated: October 24, 2016 ...

PER COURT :- 1.

The applicant prays for leave to add paragraph No.13A and prayer clause B-1 to the petition, considering the fact that the management has prepared a seniority list after the impugned judgment was delivered by the Tribunal.

2.

Learned Advocates for the non-applicants have opposed the application.

3.

Considering the nature of the addition which is sought, and the fact that the respondents are yet to file their reply in the Writ Petition, I do not find that any loss, harm or prejudice would be caused to the nonapplications, if this application is allowed. akl/d

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 2 - CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12472 OF 2016 4.

As such, this application is allowed. Applicant makes a statement that the amendment would be carried out on/or before 27.10.2016. Amendment be carried out accordingly.

5.

List the Writ Petition on 28.11.2016. Respondents in the Writ Petition shall file their affidavit-in-reply to the amended petition on/or before 23.11.2016.

( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. ) ...

akl/d