Somnath Ashok Pore And Another v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Secretary And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 923 WRIT PETITION NO.8809 OF 2022 SOMNATH ASHOK PORE AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. B. S. Shinde AGP for Respondents-State : Mr. P. S. Patil Advocate for Respondent Nos.3 and 4 : Mr. S. B. Ghute ...

WITH WRIT PETITION NO.8810 OF 2022 MADHAV NARAYAN NANDURE AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. B. S. Shinde AGP for Respondents-State : Mr. P. S. Patil Advocate for Respondent Nos.3 and 4 : Mr. S. B. Ghute ...

CORAM :

RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND ARUN R. PEDNEKER, JJ.

DATE :

25th August, 2022 PER COURT :

1.

In both these petitions, the identically situated petitioners, who have already joined their places of postings, pray that their representations set out in prayer Clause 'B' may be considered by the

WP 8809-2022 employer, in the light of the Circular dated 28/06/2018. They are not averse to transfers. It is only that the postings were inconvenient and, hence, they want a reconsideration as per the circular.

2.

The learned Advocate representing respondent Nos.3 and 4, submits that these representations would be decided as per the existing policy on or before 30/09/2022.

3.

In view of the above, both these matters are disposed off. ( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. ) ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. ) vjg/-.