← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/10172/2021disposed off

Rashtrawadi Suraksha Rakshak And General Kamgar Union Through Its Secretary Generalizers v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

2022-12-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh2 pages

wp10172.21 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 905 WRIT PETITION NO.10172 OF 2021 RASHTRAWADI SURAKSHA RAKSHAK AND GENERAL KAMGAR UNION THROUGH ITS SECRETARY (GENERALIZERS)

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Aghav Avinash D AGP for Respondent No.1: Ms. R.P Gour .....

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, JJ.

DATED : 22nd DECEMBER, 2022.

PER COURT :- 1.

The petitioner union espouses the cause of the candidates who have applied for registration under Aurangabad Security Guards Board. The petitioner has tendered a chart indicating the date on which it was registered online alongwith it's profile ID. The said chart is marked as "X-1" for identification.

2.

In identical set of circumstances, this Court at the Principal Seat, had passed an order on 20.9.2022 in writ petition No. 4725 of 2018 (Pradeep Shankar Patil and others vs Security Guards Board for Greater Mumbai and Thane District and others). 3.

The learned advocates for the respective sides are united in submitting that the order in Pradeep Shankar Patil (supra), which was followed in writ petition No. 948 of 2022 filed by Bhartiya

wp10172.21 -2Suraksha Rakshak vs. State of Maharashtra and others, may be passed in this matter.

4.

In view of the above, this petition is disposed off with the following directions:- a) Respondent No.2 Board shall consider the application tendered by the petitioner on it's own merits and in accordance with law in the light of the directions contained in the order dated 8.2.2017, passed in writ petition No. 2939 of 2016 (Pune District Suraksha Rakshak and General Kamgar Union vs. The State of Maharashtra and others), as expeditiously as possible and without any further delay.

b) All contentions of the parties are kept open. (SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , J.) rlj/