Satish Kalyan Sangde v. Vijay Tanaji Mhetre And ORS

{1} ca12401.19.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12401 OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 22738 OF 2019 Satish s/o Kalyan Sangde Applicant

Versus

Viay Tanaii Mhetre & others Respondents Mr. S. A. Wakure, advocate for the Applicant Mr. Swapnil Lohiya, advocate holding for Mr. R. F. Totala, advocate for the Respondent No.3 CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE J.

DATE : 26th September, 2022.

PC :

Heard learned Counsel for respective parties. The applicant, who is original opponent no.2 in the Claim Petition and also the registered owner of offending vehicle, is seeking condonation of delay of 361 days on the ground that he had no knowledge about the award having been passed. The learned Counsel for the Respondent No.3Insurance Company strongly opposed the application. However, considering the statutory right of the applicant and the reasons stated in the application, delay of 361 days stands condoned.

{2} ca12401.19.odt The appeal be placed for admission after removal of office obiections, if any.

Civil Application stands disposed of accordingly. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE adb