Shruti Alias Saraswati Rahul Bangar v. Rahul Raosaheb Bangar

( 1 )

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 939 MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 232 OF 2025 Shruti Alias Saraswati Rahul Bangar

VERSUS

Rahul Raosaheb Bangar ...

Mr. Ganesh Laxmanrao Kedar, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. Pralhad M. Hiwale, Advocate for Respondent. CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT, J.

DATE : 4th NOVEMBER 2025 PC :- 1.

Heard the parties.

2.

This application is filed by the applicant-wife for transfer of matrimonial proceeding bearing Marriage Petition No.A/699/2025 filed by respondent-husband from the Court of learned Judge, Family Court Bandra, to the Court of learned Judge, Family Court at Latur. 3.

It is stated that the distance between two places is around 480 k.m. The applicant wife finds it difficult to undertake such travel, as she is residing with her old aged parents who are not in a position to

( 2 ) accompany her. There are two proceedings already pending in the Court at Latur, one bearing Petition E No.82 of 2025 in the Family Court at Latur for maintenance and criminal complaint for the offence under Sections 498-A and other sections against the husband. Learned Advocate for the applicant thus prays that it is in the interest of justice to allow the application.

4.

Learned Advocate for the respondent vehemently opposed the application. He has also filed affidavit in reply. 5.

However, looking to the convenience of the applicant-wife and two other proceedings are already pending in the Court at Latur, this Court is inclined to allow the application. Hence, the following order.

ORDER

(i) Misc. Civil Application stands allowed.

(ii) The proceedings of Marriage Petition No.A/699/2025 pending in the Court of learned Judge, Family Court Bandra stands transferred to the Court of learned Judge, Family Court at Latur.. (iii) After transfer of the proceeding, the applicant shall not seek

( 3 ) unnecessary adjournments. In case the Trial Court finds that the adjournments are unnecessarily sought, the Trial Court may deal with such application, so as to compensate the respondent-husband, if he personally remains present.

(iv) Whenever request is made by the respondent-husband seeking permission to appear through video conferencing, the same shall be considered liberally by the trial Court.

(v) With this, Misc. Civil Application stands disposed off. [KISHORE C. SANT, J.]