The State Of Maharashtra And Others v. Sampat Paraji Jawalkar And Others
1 ca 11074.16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11074 OF 2016 IN REVIEW APPLICATION ST. NO. 23738 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2988 OF 2015 The State of Maharashtra .. Applicant
Versus
Uddhav Ramkisan Mhaske and others .. Non Applicants Shri S. B. Yawalkar, Addl.G.P. for Applicants. Shri A. B. Jagtap, Advocate h/f Shri V. D. Sapkal, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 5.
Ms. Surekha Mahajan, Advocate for the Respondent No. 6. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11076 OF 2016 IN REVIEW APPLICATION ST. NO. 23727 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2949 OF 2015 The State of Maharashtra and others .. Applicants
Versus
Sampat Paraji Jawalkar and others .. Non Applicants Shri S. B. Yawalkar, Addl.G.P. for Applicants. Shri A. B. Jagtap, Advocate h/f Shri V. D. Sapkal, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 5.
Ms. Surekha Mahajan, Advocate for the Respondent No. 6.
2 ca 11074.16 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11077 OF 2016 IN REVIEW APPLICATION ST. NO. 23736 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3274 OF 2015 The State of Maharashtra and others .. Applicants
Versus
Kiran Narayanrao Patil and others .. Non Applicants Shri S. B. Yawalkar, Addl.G.P. for Applicants. Shri A. B. Jagtap, Advocate h/f Shri V. D. Sapkal, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1.
The Respondent No. 2 is served.
Ms. Surekha Mahajan, Advocate for the Respondent No. 4. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA A. M. BADAR, JJ.
DATE : 30TH SEPTEMBER, 2016.
PER COURT :
.
These are the civil applications for condonation of delay caused in filing review applications.
2.
We have heard the learned Additional Government Pleader for applicants and the learned counsel for non applicants. 3.
These applications seek condonation of 57 days delay caused in filing review applications. For the reasons stated in the applications, the applications are allowed. The delay is
3 ca 11074.16 condoned. The civil applications are disposed of. [ A. M. BADAR, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/Sept. 16