← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/11873/2023admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Digambar S-O Vishwanath Nandedkar v. Sau Saraswatibai W-O Sheshrao Wanje Through Her G P A Sheshrao S-O Marotrao Wanje

2025-02-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar1 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:2986

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 59 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11873 OF 2023 IN SAST/22366/2023 Digambar S-o Vishwanath Nandedkar

VERSUS

Sau Saraswatibai W-o Sheshrao Wanje Through Her G P A Sheshrao S-o Marotrao Wanje ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. A.P. Nahar h/f A.P. Bhandari ...

CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.

Dated : February 03, 2025 PER COURT :- 1.

Heard learned counsel appearing for the applicant. 2.

The applicant seeks to condone the delay of 11 days caused in filing the second appeal.

3.

Although, respondents are served with notice of this application, none appears. Applicant states that delay is occasioned due to communication gap between himself and his advocate and also for collecting the documents, which is not intentional. 4.

Looking to the fact that applicant is litigating for rights over immovable property, the case is made out to condone the delay. Hence, application is allowed. Delay of 11 days caused in filing the appeal is condoned. CA stands disposed of.

5.

Appeal be registered subject to removal of office objections. ( S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. ) ...

aaa/-