Darshan Bhanudas Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

( 1 ) p 901 wp 9422.17

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 901 WRIT PETITION NO. 9422 OF 2017 DARSHAN BHANUDAS PATIL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Shriram Umesh B AGP for Respondents: Mr. D.R. Kale ...

CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE :

24.07.2017 P.C. :- Not on Board. Mentioned. Taken on the Production Board. In the light of the clarificatory letter from the Directorate of Technical Education addressed to all the Divisional Offices in the State of Maharashtra, namely, at Mumbai, Pune, Nashik, Aurangabad, Amravati and Nagpur, none of the recognized Institutions shall insist on production of the validity certificate.

In the circumstances, the insistence in this case by Respondent No.3/ Engineering College is contrary to this directive. We, therefore, direct Respondent No.3/ College to abide by the directives from the Director of Technical Education dated 19.07.2017 and permit the Petitioner to continue studies.

( 2 ) p 901 wp 9422.17 This order will mean that the fees should be accepted, the Petitioner be enrolled and admitted for further academic sessions/ terms, he should be allowed to appear for examinations, results be declared and even degree certificate be issued, but all this is subject to the pending proceedings before the Scrutiny Committee and the orders made therein. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. [MANGESH S. PATIL, J.] [S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.] mub