Sangita Kishan Surewad v. The Scheduled Tribe Certificate Vertifcation Committee

{1} ca 11651.11.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11651 OF 2011 IN RAST/17714/2008 WITH CA/7631/2010 IN RAST/17714/2008 WITH CA/11652/2011 IN WP/775/2008 SANGITA KISHAN SUREWAD

VERSUS

THE SCHEDULED TRIBE CERTIFICATE VERTIFCATION COMMITTEE ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Sunil M. Vibhute AGP for respondent No.1 : Mr. S.K. Kadam Advocate for respondent No.2 : Mr. P. S. Patil. CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE & A.M. BADAR, JJ.

DATE : 14th JULY, 2015.

PER COURT:

1] Delay in filing civil application for review is condoned. Amendment sought in the review application is permitted. Amendment be effected during the course of the day.

2] Heard learned counsel for the applicant. Perused the order under review. The order is quite comprehensive and does not indicate any error apparent on record. We are not convinced that the order requires review. Application seeking review stands rejected. In view of this, the application for issuing directions also stands disposed of. [A.M. BADAR] [A.V. NIRGUDE] JUDGE JUDGE.

grt/-