Shantaram Ramdas Sonawane v. The State Of Maharashtra

{1} 915 sr. no..odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1054 OF 2015 SHANTARAM RAMDAS SONAWANE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. R.J. Nirmal APP for Respondents: Mr. S. G. Karlekar . . .

CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & K.K. SONAWANE, JJ.

DATE : 25TH NOVEMBER, 2016.

PER COURT:

1] Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Mr. R.J. Nirmal Advocate (appointed) has tendered across bar memo of the writ petition. Same is taken on record. 2] Learned APP for the State has tendered across bar order passed by the Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad on 25.2.2016 granting extension of 30 days parole in favour of the petitioner on second occasion. It appears that parole was granted to the petitioner on 21.10.2014. Thereafter, on 7.1.2015 first extension of 30 days parole was granted and thereafter on 25.2.2016, second extension is given. In that view of the matter, petitioner has availed 90 days parole. Therefore, the grievance of the petitioner stands satisfied. Criminal writ petition stands disposed of. 3] Since Mr. R.J. Nirmal, Advocate is appointed as Amicus Curiae to prosecute the cause of the petitioner, his fees be paid as per the Schedule of Fees maintained by the High Court Legal Services Sub Committee, Aurangabad.

[K.K.SONAWANE] [S.S. SHINDE] grt/- JUDGE JUDGE