Madankumar Ramchandra Dugar v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

27-28-29.Cri.Appln.-2795 to 2797-2022.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 27 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2795 OF 2022 IN ALPST/7684/2022 AND 28 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2796 OF 2022 IN ALPST/7678/2022 AND 29 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2797 OF 2022 IN ALPST/7682/2022 MADANKUMAR RAMCHANDRA DUGAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Mehta Punit S.

APP for Respondent No.1/State : Mrs. P. V. Diggikar Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Pande Balraj Prakash ...

CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT, J.

DATE : 14th MARCH 2023.

Per Court :

1.

The applicant has filed these applications seeking condonation of delay of 41 days that is caused in filing application seeking leave to file appeal against acquittal.

27-28-29.Cri.Appln.-2795 to 2797-2022.doc 2.

The learned Advocate for respondent no.2 vehemently opposed the applications.

3.

Considering that the delay is only of 41 days, the delay deserves to be condoned. Hence the applications are allowed and the delay is conodoned.

4.

Office to register the applications (ALP) seeking leave to file appeal against acquittal.

[ KISHORE C. SANT, J.] Najeeb.