Manik Tukaram Ingle v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

931 wp.10176.21.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

931 WRIT PETITION NO.10176 OF 2021 MANIK TUKARAM INGLE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Sushant C. Yeramwar. AGP for Respondent/State: Ms R. P. Gour.

Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. D. S. Bagul. ...

CORAM :

S. V. GANGAPURWALA & R. N. LADDHA, JJ.

DATE :

15th September, 2021.

P.C.:

1.

It is submitted that validation proceeding in respect of the tribe claim of petitioner is pending with the scrutiny committee, the same is not decided.

2.

Without issuing notice to petitioner, the respondents have placed petitioner on the supernumerary post.

3.

As the impugned action is without notice to the petitioner, we quash and set aside the impugned action.

4.

In case, respondents want to take action against the petitioner of placing the petitioner on supernumerary post or otherwise, then notice shall be given to the petitioner giving opportunity to show cause. In that event, the petitioner can file reply and bring all the

931 wp.10176.21.odt relevant facts to the notice of the respondent-Committee. 5.

The Committee shall decide the validation proceedings expeditiously and preferably within a period of nine months. 6.

The petitioner shall appear before the Committee on 4th October, 2021.

7.

Writ Petition accordingly disposed of. No costs. [ R. N. LADDHA, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] nga