← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/9235/2019admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Pramod Anna Mete v. Shital Pramod Mete

2020-02-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.K. Jadhav1 pages

ca9235.19 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 950 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9235 OF 2019 IN AOST/22973/2019 WITH CA/9236/2019 IN AOST/22973/2019 PRAMOD ANNA METE

VERSUS

SHITAL PRAMOD METE .....

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Naik Dhananjay A. Advocate for Respondents : Mr. V.P. savant .....

CORAM : V. K. JADHAV, J.

DATED : 28th FEBRUARY, 2020 PER COURT:- 1.

Heard both sides.

2.

The applicant's father was old aged person and he was bedridden. The applicant is the only person in the family to look after his ailing father. In view of the same, delay of 34 days is caused in filing the Appeal from Order. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent sole has not seriously objected this application. 3.

In view of above and for the reasons stated in the civil application, civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause "B" and disposed of.

( V. K. JADHAV, J.) rlj/