Gorakh Digambar Rathod v. Shivramkrishna Pulusu Nagbhushanam And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 51 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13543 OF 2018 IN FAST/23745/2018 GORAKH DIGAMBAR RATHOD

VERSUS

SHIVRAMKRISHNA PULUSU NAGBHUSHANAM AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. A. G.

Vasmatkar and Mr. Nitin P.

Wangikar Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Rahul M. Gaikwad h/f. Mr. M. M. Ambhore ...

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE :

19/12/2022.

PER COURT :

The bailiff report indicates that respondent No. 1 remained unserved since he refused to accept the service. As such, respondent No. 1 is treated as served.

2.

Heard rival submissions. The applicant is seeking condonation of delay of 57 days which appears to be caused due to his financial crisis. The learned Tribunal has rejected the claim petition. In view of the same and for the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 57 days stands condoned.

3.

The appeal be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

4.

The application is accordingly disposed of.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE .....

shp/-