← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/13103/2022admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Ashokkumar Ramkishan Sikchi And ORS v. The Administrator, Cidco, Office, Jalna Road, Aurangabad And ANR

2022-09-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne2 pages

1 CA / 13103 / 2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 910 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13103 OF 2022 IN X-OBJST/6661/2022 IN FA/1303/2021 ASHOKKUMAR RAMKISHAN SIKCHI AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE ADMINISTRATOR, CIDCO, OFFICE, JALNA ROAD, AURANGABAD AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Lakhotiya Pawan K. AGP for the respondent - State : Mr. A.S. Shinde Advocate for respondent - CIDCO : Mr. R.B. Jaju h/f. Mr. A.S. Bajaj ...

CORAM

: MANGESH S. PATIL & SANDEEP V. MARNE, JJ.

DATE : 16 SEPTEMBER 2022 PC :

Heard.

2.

Issue notice.

3.

Learned advocate Mr. Jaju h/f. Mr. Bajaj waives service for the respondent - CIDCO and learned AGP waives service for the State.

4.

For the reasons mentioned in the application, the application is allowed, subject to the condition that the office objections are now removed within two weeks, the Cross Objection shall stand restoed by condoning the delay.

2 CA / 13103 / 2022 5.

If the office objections are not removed, the order shall stand recalled automatically without reference to the Court. [ SANDEEP V. MARNE ] [ MANGESH S. PATIL ] JUDGE JUDGE arp/