← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/13011/2017disposed offdismissed for default

Savita Arun Rathod v. Sunil Digambar Chavan U/G Of Father Digambar Sukhlal Chavan And Others

2017-11-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.S. Shinde,Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.K. Jadhav2 pages

13011.17CA.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13011 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3910 OF 2016 Savita W/o Arun Rathod ..APPLICANT

VERSUS

Sunil S/o Digambar Chavan and others.

..RESPONDENTS ...

Mr. G.J. Pahilwan, Advocate for applicant.

Mr. V.M. Kagne, AGP for Respondent/State Advocate for respondent no.1:Mr. S.N. Lale Yelwatkar ...

CORAM: S.S.SHINDE & V.K. JADHAV,JJ.

DATE : 10TH NOVEMBER, 2017 ORAL ORDER :

We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicant. Perused the grounds set out in the application and the order under review.

2.

Upon careful perusal of the grounds taken in the application, we are of the

13011.17CA.odt opinion that, none of the grounds give rise so as to review the order under review. There is no error apparent on the face of record to review the order under review. In that view of the matter, we are unable to persuade ourselves to grant any relief in favour of the applicant. Hence the application stands rejected.

3.

Needless to observe that, if the Education Officer has passed the order pursuant to the directions issued by this Court on 21st April, 2016 by order under review, it is open for the aggrieved party to take exception to such order.

[V.K. JADHAV] [S.S.SHINDE] JUDGE JUDGE SGA