← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/13928/2022delay condonatedrejected

Maseeranaz Kamil Khan Pathan (Minor) Thr Her Father Kamil Khan Kale Khan Pathan v. Deepak Ramdas Johare And ANR

2022-11-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More1 pages

(1) 904 CA-13928.2022.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 904 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13928 OF 2022 IN X-OBJST/22363/2022 MASEERANAZ KAMIL KHAN PATHAN (MINOR) THR HER FATHER KAMIL KHAN KALE KHAN PATHAN

VERSUS

DEEPAK RAMDAS JOHARE AND ANOTHER ...

Mr. M.M. Bhokarikar, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Akshay Kulkarni, Advocate holding for Mr. Amit Yadkikar, Advocate for respondent No.1.

...

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED :

29.11.2022.

ORDER:- 1.

Heard rival submissions. The applicants - claimants are seeking condonation of delay of 91 days in filing cross objections. The delay appears to be caused due to their financial difficulty. The learned Counsel for respondent No.1 strongly opposed the application. However, considering the statutory right of the applicants, the delay of 91 days stands condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the said period of delay for the enhanced amount of compensation, if granted.

2.

The Cross objection be registered after removal of office objections, if any.

3.

The application is accordingly disposed of.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) vd_dhirde