Sunita Gangadhar Markhale v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD _____________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ______________________________________________________ 11 WRIT PETITION NO. 8519 OF 2016 WITH WP/8520/2016 WITH WP/8521/2016 WITH WP/8522/2016 WITH WP/8523/2016 WITH WP/8524/2016 WITH WP/8525/2016 WITH WP/8526/2016 WITH WP/8527/2016 WITH WP/8528/2016 WITH WP/8529/2016 WITH WP/8530/2016 WITH WP/8531/2016 WITH WP/8532/2016 WITH WP/8533/2016 WITH WP/8534/2016 ANURADHA TUKARAM KAMBLE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr.Bhosle Santosh C.

AGP for Respondents/State: Mr.A.V.

Deshmukh.

...

CORAM: S.S. SHINDE & SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.

Dated: AUGUST 08, 2016 ...

The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have filed representations with the Divisional Commissioner (Revenue), Aurangabad, which are pending for decision.

2.

The learned Counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, seeks

8519.16wp+ liberty to withdraw the petitions. Liberty granted as prayed for.

3.

The writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.

4.

However, we hope and expect that the Divisional Commissioner (Revenue), Aurangabad will decide the representations of the petitioners, if already not decided, as expeditiously as possible;

however, within three weeks from today.

(SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J) (S.S. SHINDE, J) kadam/