Pandit Sopanrao @ Sampatrao Barhate v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

939-ca-376-2019.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 376 OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 23842 OF 2018 Pandith Sopanrao Barhate ... Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others ... Respondents ....

Mr. V. D. Bhise, Advocate for applicant Mr. A. M. Phule, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 Mr. Ruturaj Patil, Advocate for respondent No.3 ....

CORAM : R. G. AVACHAT, J.

DATED : 14th OCTOBER, 2021 PER COURT :- .

Heard.

2.

For the reasons given in the application, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clause (A) on condition that the applicant shall not be entitled for interest for the delayed period of 1171 days. Moreover, in circulation of this application, the delay is of about five years since the date of application is 27.10.2016, the applicant shall not be entitled for component of interest or any other monetary benefits from 27.10.2016 to the date of this order.

(( 2 )) 939-ca-376-2019 3.

Appeal be registered.

4.

On registration of appeal, issue notice to the respondents, returnable after ten (10) weeks. 5.

Learned AGP waives service of notice on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and Shri Ruturaj Patil, learned Advocate waives service of notice on behalf of respondent No.3 - acquiring body.

6.

Call record and proceedings.

[ R. G. AVACHAT, J. ] SMS